CoinTalk
A total of 1842 cryptocurrency questions
Share Your Thoughts with BYDFi
Trending
Banks’ Stablecoin Fears Are Unsubstantiated Myths, Says Professor
Banks’ Stablecoin Fears Are Built on Myths, Says Columbia Professor
As US lawmakers prepare to move forward with long-awaited crypto market structure legislation, a fierce battle is unfolding behind the scenes — and stablecoins have become the unexpected flashpoint. According to a Columbia Business School professor, the loudest objections coming from the banking sector are not based on evidence, but on fear of losing profits.
Omid Malekan, an adjunct professor at Columbia and a well-known crypto educator, argues that much of the resistance to stablecoin yield-sharing is rooted in misinformation deliberately pushed to protect the traditional banking model. In a recent post on X, Malekan expressed frustration that progress on crypto legislation is being slowed by what he described as unsubstantiated myths surrounding stablecoin economics.
The Real Fight: Who Controls Stablecoin Yield?
At the heart of the debate lies a simple but powerful question: who should benefit from the interest generated by stablecoin reserves?
Stablecoin issuers typically hold reserves in US Treasury bills and bank deposits, which generate yield. Banks and their lobbyists argue that allowing issuers or platforms to share this yield with users creates a dangerous loophole. Their fear is that consumers, attracted by passive returns of around 5%, could pull billions of dollars out of traditional savings accounts, triggering a so-called deposit flight.
Malekan rejects this argument outright, calling it a convenient narrative designed to shield banks from competition rather than protect the financial system.
Why Stablecoins Don’t Drain Bank Deposits
One of the most persistent claims from the banking industry is that stablecoin adoption will inevitably shrink bank deposits. Malekan says this assumption ignores how the stablecoin market actually works.
Much of the demand for stablecoins comes from outside the United States. When foreign users purchase dollar-backed stablecoins, issuers are required to place reserves into US-based assets, including Treasury bills and bank deposits. Rather than draining the system, this process can inject new capital into American banks and government debt markets.
From this perspective, stablecoins are not a threat to deposits but a mechanism that can expand financial activity across borders.
Competition Isn’t the Problem — Profits Are
Another key myth, according to Malekan, is that stablecoins will cripple bank lending. In reality, stablecoins do not prevent banks from issuing loans. What they do is challenge banks’ ability to pay near-zero interest while earning substantial returns elsewhere.
Today, the average US savings account yields just over half a percent. If banks fear losing customers to yield-bearing stablecoins, Malekan argues, the solution is straightforward: pay savers more. Stablecoins introduce competition, not collapse.
Banks Are No Longer the Main Credit Engine
The argument that stablecoins could choke off credit also ignores a structural shift in the US financial system. Banks now provide only about one-fifth of total credit in the economy. The majority comes from non-bank sources such as money market funds, private credit firms, and capital markets.
These sectors could actually benefit from stablecoin adoption through faster settlement, lower transaction costs, and potentially reduced Treasury yields. Rather than weakening the system, stablecoins may enhance its efficiency.
Community Banks Aren’t the Real Victims
Much of the lobbying effort frames community and regional banks as the most vulnerable players. Malekan calls this another misleading narrative.
According to him, large money-center banks have far more to lose if stablecoins disrupt the status quo. Community banks are often used as a shield in public messaging, while the real objective is protecting the outsized profits of the largest financial institutions.
He describes the situation as an uncomfortable alliance between big banks defending their margins and certain crypto startups pitching services to smaller banks under the guise of protection.
Savers Matter Too — Not Just Borrowers
Public policy discussions often focus heavily on borrowers, but Malekan insists that savers deserve equal attention. Preventing stablecoin issuers from sharing yield effectively forces consumers to subsidize bank profits by accepting minimal returns on their money.
A healthy economy depends on both savers and borrowers. Blocking innovation that benefits savers simply to preserve existing profit structures undermines that balance.
Congress Faces a Choice: Consumers or Corporations
Malekan concludes with a clear message to lawmakers. The stablecoin yield debate should not be about preserving legacy advantages but about encouraging innovation and serving consumers.
He warns that many of the claims circulating in Washington lack empirical support and urges Congress to remain focused on progress rather than pressure from powerful lobbies.
Growing Pushback Against Banking Influence
The debate has also drawn reactions from legal and political figures. Lawyer and Senate candidate John Deaton recently reminded voters that senators are facing intense pressure from banking interests to prevent platforms like Coinbase from offering stablecoin rewards.
Deaton’s message was blunt: banks and career politicians do not necessarily act in the public’s best interest. He pointed out that restrictions on stablecoin yields could stifle innovation and limit consumer choice.
Coinbase has reportedly gone as far as warning that it may withdraw support for the CLARITY Act if lawmakers impose restrictions on stablecoin rewards beyond basic disclosure requirements — a sign of how high the stakes have become.
A Defining Moment for Crypto Regulation
As the market structure bill heads toward markup, the stablecoin yield issue may determine whether the US embraces a more competitive, consumer-focused financial system or reinforces the dominance of traditional banks.
2026-01-19 · 8 days ago0 056SEC Launches Crypto 2.0 Task Force: Here’s What’s Changing
A New Era Dawns: Inside the SEC's Crypto 2.0 Revolution
The winds of change are sweeping through the halls of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Gone are the days of what many in the digital asset space viewed as regulatory ambiguity and adversarial enforcement. In its place, a new, collaborative spirit is taking root, heralded by the launch of a dedicated Crypto Task Force. This isn't just a policy tweak; it’s being called a fundamental reset — Crypto 2.0.
The Catalyst: A Political and Philosophical Sea Change
The shift is inextricably linked to a broader political transformation. With the arrival of the first U.S. president to actively champion cryptocurrency, the regulatory landscape entered uncharted territory. The most tangible symbol of this new direction was the immediate departure of former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, a figure synonymous with stringent crypto enforcement, and the installation of a new, more industry-amenable leadership.
Acting Chairman Mark Uyeda moved with striking speed, announcing the formation of the SEC Crypto Task Force on January 21, 2025. To lead this critical mission, he turned to a familiar and celebrated voice within crypto circles: Commissioner Hester Peirce, long known as “Crypto Mom” for her dissents against the agency’s aggressive legal actions. Her appointment sent a clear, unmistakable signal: the era of regulation by enforcement is giving way to an era of regulation by dialogue and clarity.
Meet the Architects of Clarity
The task force, under Peirce’s stewardship, has a mandate that reads like an industry wish list: to draw clear regulatory lines, create feasible registration pathways, design sensible disclosure processes, and apply enforcement resources judiciously. This mission is further empowered by the expected influence of Paul Atkins, the nominee for SEC Chairman, whose philosophy champions market-driven innovation balanced with essential consumer protection.
Together, they represent a dynamic new leadership team poised to bridge the chasm between cutting-edge technology and traditional finance. Peirce has already extended an open invitation, calling on builders, enthusiasts, and skeptics to engage in the process of shaping the final rules.
Action Speaks Louder: The Crypto 2.0 Agenda in Motion
This task force is not a passive study group. It hit the ground running, demonstrating its intent through decisive early action. In a move that reverberated across financial institutions, the controversial Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (SAB 121) was swiftly repealed. This rule, which forced companies to list customer crypto holdings as liabilities on their balance sheets, had long been criticized for stifling institutional crypto custody. Commissioner Peirce’s simple farewell on X said it all: Bye, bye SAB 121! It’s not been fun.
But this was just the opening act. The real blueprint emerged in Commissioner Peirce’s “Journey Begins” statement, outlining a ambitious 10-point plan that will define the coming months. This plan moves beyond theory to tackle the most contentious, real-world issues head-on:
1- The Eternal Question: Security or Not? At the heart of the confusion is determining which digital assets are securities. The task force is undertaking a rigorous examination to fit various crypto assets into existing laws, aiming to finally calm the turbulent seas of legal uncertainty.
2- A Path for Token Offerings In a groundbreaking potential shift, the commission is considering temporary rules for initial coin offerings (ICOs). These rules could offer relief—both looking forward and backward—for token issuers who provide specific disclosures and cooperate on fraud matters, potentially allowing their tokens to be traded freely as non-securities.
3- Building Practical Guardrails The agenda is intensely practical. It promises to craft workable custody solutions for investment advisers, deliver clarity on the regulatory status of crypto lending and staking programs, and establish a straightforward process for evaluating the flood of crypto ETF applications.
4- Fostering Innovation Looking to the future, the task force will explore how blockchain technology can integrate with traditional securities clearing and transfer systems. It even proposes a cross-border sandbox to support global blockchain experimentation, acknowledging the inherently international nature of the technology.
Beyond the Headlines: What This Transformation Truly Means
The creation of this task force is more than a new committee; it is a profound cultural shift within a key financial regulator. The message to the crypto industry is transitioning from comply or face consequences to engage and help us build. This collaborative approach aims to spark responsible innovation within the United States, rather than forcing it to flee overseas.
While the task force emphasizes this is not a free-for-all, the commitment to providing clear frameworks and realistic registration pathways represents the clearest light at the end of the tunnel the U.S. crypto industry has seen in years. The journey to untangle the current regulatory mess will be long, but for the first time, the builders and innovators in crypto have a dedicated team inside the SEC ready to listen and construct a path forward. The era of Crypto 2.0 has officially begun.
Ready to Take Control of Your Crypto Journey? Start Trading Safely on BYDFi
2026-01-16 · 11 days ago0 056The "Help" That Steals: How to Spot Fake Crypto Support Scams
Imagine the scenario. You are trying to move your funds to catch a fast-moving opportunity, but the transaction gets stuck. It has been thirty minutes, the blockchain is congested, and your money is nowhere to be found. Panic sets in. Your heart rate spikes. In a moment of desperation, you open X (formerly Twitter) or jump into a Telegram group and type out a plea for help.
Almost instantly, a notification pops up. A friendly profile with the official logo of the wallet or exchange you are using replies to you. They apologize for the inconvenience and offer to resolve the issue immediately. They speak professionally, using technical jargon that sounds legitimate. You breathe a sigh of relief, thinking you have found a savior.
But you haven't found a savior. You have just walked into the most prevalent and psychologically damaging trap in the cryptocurrency industry: the Fake Customer Support Scam. Within minutes, your wallet will be drained, and that helpful agent will vanish into the digital ether, leaving you with nothing but a hard lesson in social engineering.
The Psychology of Panic
The reason this scam works so well isn't because the technology is advanced; it works because it exploits human emotion. Scammers know that when money is involved, logic goes out the window. They patrol social media platforms using bots that search for keywords like "Metamask help," "transaction stuck," or "wallet error." They are like vultures circling a wounded animal, waiting for someone to signal that they are confused or afraid.
Once they make contact, their primary weapon is urgency mixed with authority. They create a "ticket" number to make the interaction feel official. They might direct you to a website that looks exactly like the official support portal, complete with live chat functionality. The goal is to keep you moving so fast that you don't stop to check the URL or the username. They play on your fear that if you don't act right now, your funds will be lost forever.
The "Wallet Validation" Trick
The conversation almost always leads to a specific request. The scammer will claim that your wallet is "out of sync" or requires "manual validation" on the blockchain backend to release the stuck transaction. It sounds plausible to a non-technical user, but it is complete nonsense.
To "fix" this, they will send you a link to a website asking you to connect your wallet or, more brazenly, ask you to input your twelve-word seed phrase to "verify ownership." This is the moment of truth. If you type those twelve words into their form, you have handed them the keys to the vault. No legitimate support agent, developer, or exchange administrator will ever ask for your seed phrase. The moment someone requests it, the mask has slipped, and you are talking to a thief.
The Danger of Remote Access
A more aggressive evolution of this scam involves remote desktop software. The "agent" might claim the issue is too complex to fix via chat and ask to screen-share using tools like TeamViewer or AnyDesk to guide you through the process.
This is arguably more dangerous than a phishing link. Once you grant them remote access, they can take control of your computer. They aren't just looking for your crypto; they can install keyloggers, access your bank accounts, or search your computer for unencrypted files containing passwords. They will often distract you in the chat window while they quietly execute transactions in the background. By the time you realize the mouse cursor is moving on its own, it is often too late.
How Real Support Actually Works
To protect yourself, you must understand how legitimate companies operate. Real customer support is reactive, not proactive. They will never DM you first on social media. If you receive an unsolicited message from "Support_Agent_007" offering to help you, it is a scam.
Legitimate platforms use internal ticketing systems. For example, if you encounter an issue while trading on the Spot market at a professional exchange, the support interaction happens within the official app or website domain. It never moves to WhatsApp or Telegram. The verification process happens through your login credentials, not by asking you to reveal your private secrets.
The Zero-Trust Policy
The only way to survive in the crypto ecosystem is to adopt a policy of zero trust. Verify everything. If an account looks official on Twitter, check the handle carefully. Scammers often replace a lowercase "L" with an uppercase "I" or add an underscore to mimic official accounts.
Furthermore, slow down. If your transaction is stuck, it is likely just network congestion. Waiting an hour is infinitely better than rushing into a scam and losing everything. Your panic is the scammer's paycheck. By remaining calm and refusing to share private keys or screen access, you render their entire toolkit useless.
Conclusion
The "friendly" stranger in your DMs is not your friend. They are a predator utilizing the anonymity of the internet to prey on new investors. Customer support scams are successful because they look like help right up until the moment they become theft.
The best defense is using platforms that provide secure, verified channels for assistance. When you Register at BYDFi, you gain access to a trading environment with official, in-app customer support, ensuring that when you ask for help, you are speaking to a professional, not an imposter.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Will a support agent ever ask for my seed phrase?
A: No. Never. Under no circumstances will a legitimate employee ask for your seed phrase or private key. This is the single biggest red flag in crypto.Q: What should I do if I accidentally shared my seed phrase?
A: You must act immediately. Create a brand new wallet on a secure device and transfer any remaining funds to it instantly. Once a seed phrase is compromised, that wallet is burned forever; never use it again.Q: Are "verified" accounts on X (Twitter) safe?
A: Not always. Scammers can buy "verified" blue checkmarks or hack legitimate accounts to impersonate support staff. Always check the handle, not just the checkmark.2026-01-23 · 4 days ago0 054Zcash Developers Leave Electric Coin Company to Form New Firm
Zcash Developers Exit Electric Coin Company in Major Governance Rift, Prepare to Launch New Independent Firm
The team responsible for developing one of the crypto industry’s most well-known privacy-focused blockchains has officially parted ways with its long-time organizational home. Developers behind Zcash have left the Electric Coin Company, signaling a dramatic internal rupture that underscores ongoing tensions around governance, decentralization, and control within open-source crypto projects.
Josh Swihart, CEO of Electric Coin Company, confirmed that the entire ECC staff has resigned following what he described as a prolonged breakdown in alignment between the company and Bootstrap, the nonprofit organization created to support Zcash. According to Swihart, the disagreement was not rooted in technology, funding shortages, or market pressure, but rather in fundamental differences over mission, authority, and the ability of the development team to operate with independence and integrity.
Over the past several weeks, Swihart said, decisions made by key members of the Bootstrap board increasingly conflicted with the original purpose of ECC. He pointed to actions involving prominent figures within the Zcash ecosystem, including members associated with Zcash Community Grants, arguing that these governance moves effectively altered the team’s role and limited its ability to carry out its responsibilities. As a result, the developers concluded that remaining within the existing structure would compromise both their work and the principles upon which Zcash was built.
Swihart stated that changes imposed on the team’s employment terms made it impossible to continue under the ECC banner. Rather than accept conditions they believed undermined their mission, the developers chose to walk away together. He framed the decision as an effort to protect years of work from governance interference and to preserve the long-standing vision of creating private, censorship-resistant digital money.
Despite the separation, Swihart emphasized that the team is not abandoning Zcash. Instead, the developers are preparing to establish a new independent company that will carry forward the same technical expertise, research experience, and long-term goals. According to him, the name on the door may change, but the mission remains identical: advancing privacy-preserving financial infrastructure that can operate without centralized control.
Zcash Protocol Remains Stable and Unaffected
While the organizational shakeup has drawn attention across the crypto community, both current and former Zcash leaders have been quick to reassure users that the protocol itself remains fully intact. Swihart stressed that Zcash is not owned or controlled by any single company, foundation, or nonprofit. Its codebase is public, open source, and accessible to anyone who wishes to contribute, audit, or build upon it.
The Zcash network continues to rely on miners, node operators, validators, and users distributed across the globe. Because of this decentralized structure, no internal dispute or corporate exit can halt transactions, alter balances, or compromise privacy guarantees. Developers outside ECC can still submit improvements, and the community retains the ability to maintain forks or alternative implementations if necessary.
Former ECC CEO and Zcash co-founder Zooko Wilcox also weighed in on the situation, offering a contrasting perspective. Wilcox publicly defended the Bootstrap board, stating that he has worked closely with several of its members for more than a decade under intense and challenging conditions. Based on his experience, he described them as individuals of strong character and integrity.
Wilcox reiterated that the current conflict does not weaken the Zcash network in any meaningful way. He emphasized that Zcash was designed from the outset to be permissionless, secure, and resilient to internal politics. According to him, users can continue to transact, store value, and rely on Zcash’s privacy features without concern, regardless of the organizational changes happening behind the scenes.
Market Reaction Reflects Short-Term Uncertainty
The news of the split had an immediate impact on market sentiment. Zcash declined by nearly seven percent over a 24-hour period following the announcement, with the token trading around $461 at the time of reporting. Price action during the day showed volatility, with ZEC moving between approximately $452 and $497 as traders reacted to headlines and assessed the long-term implications.
This pullback follows a period of renewed interest in privacy-focused cryptocurrencies. In November of last year, Zcash experienced a strong rally as demand for financial privacy narratives resurfaced across the broader crypto market. During that surge, the price briefly reached the $723 level, supported in part by endorsements and commentary from high-profile industry figures such as Arthur Hayes.
While the recent decline suggests caution among short-term traders, some long-term observers view the current situation as a governance issue rather than a technical or security failure. From this perspective, market volatility may reflect uncertainty rather than a loss of confidence in Zcash’s underlying technology.
A Defining Moment for Zcash’s Future
The departure of the entire Electric Coin Company development team represents a pivotal moment in Zcash’s evolution. It highlights the ongoing challenge faced by decentralized projects as they balance open governance with effective leadership and sustainable development. As the original builders move forward with a new company, questions remain about how coordination between developers, nonprofits, and the broader community will unfold.
At the same time, the episode reinforces the core promise of decentralization. Zcash continues to function exactly as designed, independent of any single organization or leadership group. Whether the ecosystem ultimately benefits from renewed competition, parallel development paths, or deeper community involvement remains to be seen.
For now, Zcash stands as a live example of both the strengths and complexities of decentralized governance, operating as usual on-chain while its human institutions undergo a significant transformation.
As governance debates reshape parts of the crypto industry, many investors are focusing on platforms that offer stability, transparency, and advanced trading tools. BYDFi provides access to major cryptocurrencies, including privacy-focused assets, with a secure infrastructure, deep liquidity, and intuitive tools designed for both beginners and experienced traders.
For users seeking flexible trading options, risk management features, and a platform built for global markets, BYDFi continues to stand out as a reliable choice in a rapidly evolving digital asset landscape.
2026-01-09 · 18 days ago0 054How to Trade Cryptocurrency: The Ultimate Beginner’s Guide
Entering the world of cryptocurrency trading can feel like stepping into a sci-fi movie. The markets never sleep, the volatility is extreme, and the terminology—HODL, FOMO, RSI, MACD—can be overwhelming. However, beneath the chaotic surface lies a structured financial market that offers unparalleled opportunities for those willing to learn the ropes.
Trading is distinct from investing. An investor buys Bitcoin and holds it for five years, ignoring the daily noise. A trader actively participates in the market, attempting to profit from short-term price movements. Whether you are looking to catch the next pump or simply hedge your portfolio, understanding the mechanics of trading is essential.
Understanding the Different Ways to Trade
Before you buy your first coin, you must decide how you want to trade. In the crypto ecosystem, there are two primary methods, each serving a different purpose.
1. Spot Trading
This is the most straightforward form of trading. When you engage in Spot Trading, you are buying the actual asset. If you buy Bitcoin on the spot market, you own that Bitcoin. You can withdraw it to a hardware wallet or use it to pay for goods.- Pros: Simple, lower risk (no liquidation price), and you own the underlying asset.
- Cons: You can only profit if the price goes up.
2. Derivatives (Futures & Swaps)
This is where the professionals operate. Derivatives allow you to speculate on the future price of an asset without actually owning it. Through Perpetual Contracts (Swap), you can trade with leverage—meaning you can open a large position with a small amount of capital. Crucially, this allows you to "Short" the market, profiting when prices fall.- Pros: High profit potential, ability to profit in bear markets, and capital efficiency.
- Cons: Higher risk due to leverage and potential liquidation.
Fundamental vs. Technical Analysis
To be a successful trader, you cannot rely on luck. You need a framework for making decisions. There are two main schools of thought.
Fundamental Analysis (FA) involves looking at the "big picture." You aren't looking at charts; you are looking at the intrinsic value of the project.
- Does the coin solve a real problem?
- Who is on the team?
- Is the network activity (on-chain volume) growing?
- Are there upcoming news events or upgrades?
Technical Analysis (TA) ignores the news and focuses entirely on price action. TA traders believe that all market information is already reflected in the price chart. By studying patterns, candlesticks, and indicators (like Moving Averages or RSI), they try to predict where the price will move next. The best traders often use a mix of both—using FA to decide what to trade and TA to decide when to trade.
Tools to Automate Your Success
One of the biggest challenges for beginners is the emotional toll of trading. Fear and greed often lead to bad decisions, like selling at the bottom or buying the top. Fortunately, modern exchanges offer tools to remove human error from the equation.
Copy Trading
If you don't have the time to study charts for hours a day, you can leverage the expertise of others. Copy Trading allows you to automatically mirror the trades of professional investors. When they buy, you buy. When they sell, you sell. It is an excellent way for beginners to earn while they learn, observing how veterans manage their positions in real-time.Trading Bots
For those who prefer a more algorithmic approach, a Trading Bot can be a game-changer. These automated programs run 24/7, executing trades based on pre-set parameters. For example, a "Grid Bot" can automatically buy small amounts when the price drops and sell when it rises, capturing profit from normal market volatility while you sleep.The Golden Rule: Risk Management
The difference between a gambler and a trader is risk management. In crypto, where assets can drop 20% in a single hour, protecting your capital is more important than making profits.
- Stop-Loss Orders: Never enter a trade without an exit plan. A stop-loss automatically sells your position if the price drops below a certain level, preventing a small loss from becoming a catastrophic one.
- Position Sizing: Never go "all in" on a single trade. A common rule of thumb is to risk no more than 1% to 2% of your total portfolio on any single setup.
- Understand Leverage: While leverage can multiply your gains, it also multiplies your losses. Beginners should start with low leverage (2x or 3x) until they are comfortable with the volatility.
Interpreting Market Cycles
Finally, successful trading requires understanding where we are in the market cycle. Crypto markets historically move in four phases:
- Accumulation: Prices are low and flat. Smart money is buying quietly.
- Markup (Bull Market): Prices explode upward. Retail investors enter, driven by FOMO.
- Distribution: Prices peak and chop sideways. Smart money begins to sell to latecomers.
- Markdown (Bear Market): Prices crash. Panic selling occurs.
Identifying these cycles allows you to align your strategy with the broader trend. In a Markup phase, "buying the dip" works wonders. In a Markdown phase, capital preservation or shorting is the better play.
Conclusion
Trading cryptocurrency is a journey of continuous learning. It requires patience, discipline, and the right tools. By understanding the difference between spot and derivatives, utilizing automation, and strictly managing your risk, you can navigate the volatility and build lasting wealth.
The market rewards those who are prepared. Whether you want to execute manual trades or let a bot handle the heavy lifting, having a robust platform is the first step to success.
Ready to start your trading journey? Register on BYDFi today to access world-class Spot and Derivatives trading tools.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Can I start trading crypto with a small amount of money?
Yes. You do not need thousands of dollars to begin. On platforms like BYDFi, you can start trading with as little as $10. This allows you to practice your strategies and get a feel for the market without risking significant capital.Q: What is the difference between a market order and a limit order?
A market order executes immediately at the current market price (best for speed). A limit order allows you to set a specific price at which you want to buy or sell (best for precision). Using limit orders helps you enter the market at your desired price point rather than chasing the pump.Q: Is crypto trading safe?
Trading involves financial risk due to market volatility. However, using a secure and regulated platform minimizes security risks. Always enable Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) and use features like stop-losses to protect your funds from sudden market downturns.2026-01-06 · 21 days ago0 054
BYDFi Official Blog
Popular Questions
How to Use Bappam TV to Watch Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi Movies?
How to Withdraw Money from Binance to a Bank Account in the UAE?
ISO 20022 Coins: What They Are, Which Cryptos Qualify, and Why It Matters for Global Finance
Bitcoin Dominance Chart: Your Guide to Crypto Market Trends in 2025
The Best DeFi Yield Farming Aggregators: A Trader's Guide