Bitcoin-to-gold ratio hits fresh lows as analysts call BTC undervaluation rare

Bitcoin-to-Gold Ratio Slides to Multi-Year Lows — A Warning Sign or a Once-in-a-Cycle Opportunity?

A Silent Shift in the Bitcoin–Gold Relationship

Financial markets are witnessing a subtle yet powerful shift. While gold dominates headlines with record-breaking price levels, Bitcoin’s relative strength against the precious metal has weakened dramatically. The Bitcoin-to-gold ratio, a long-standing macro indicator watched closely by institutional investors, has fallen to its lowest level since late 2023. On the surface, this appears to signal Bitcoin’s fading appeal. Beneath the surface, however, analysts argue it may represent something far more significant.

The Bitcoin-to-gold ratio reflects how many ounces of gold are required to purchase one Bitcoin. As of this week, that figure slipped to around 18.5 ounces, driven largely by gold’s explosive rally rather than a collapse in Bitcoin itself. Gold surged toward the $4,900 level, while Bitcoin struggled to sustain momentum above $90,000, creating a widening valuation gap that has not gone unnoticed.

Gold’s Rally Is More Than Just a Safe-Haven Trade

Gold’s strength is not merely a reaction to short-term uncertainty. According to long-term historical data, gold bull markets over the past century have delivered average gains exceeding 150%. Charles Edwards, founder of Capriole Investments, has highlighted that if history follows a familiar path, gold’s current rally may still be in its early stages. Under such conditions, prices could potentially rise toward the $10,000–$12,000 range over the coming decade.

This surge reflects a deeper shift in global capital allocation. Investors are increasingly questioning the sustainability of sovereign debt, the reliability of long-duration bonds, and the long-term purchasing power of fiat currencies. As confidence in traditional financial instruments erodes, capital naturally seeks refuge in assets perceived as scarce, tangible, and politically neutral. Gold, with thousands of years of monetary history, has once again become the first destination for that flow.

Bitcoin Left Behind — Temporarily

Bitcoin’s relative underperformance does not necessarily imply weakness in its fundamentals. Instead, it highlights Bitcoin’s position on the risk spectrum. During periods of elevated uncertainty, investors tend to favor assets with lower volatility and established credibility. Gold fits that profile perfectly. Bitcoin, despite its growing institutional adoption, is still viewed as a higher-risk asset — one that investors prefer to approach later in the cycle rather than at its onset.

This dynamic has played out repeatedly over the past decade. Gold often leads during the early phases of macro stress, while Bitcoin lags. Once risk appetite stabilizes and confidence begins to return, Bitcoin historically transitions from underperformer to outperformer, often at a pace that far exceeds traditional assets.

Technical Signals Hint at Trend Exhaustion

From a technical perspective, some analysts believe the Bitcoin-to-gold ratio is approaching a critical inflection point. Crypto analyst Decode has applied Elliott Wave theory to the BTC/gold pair, suggesting that the ratio may be completing the final phase of a corrective structure. In Elliott Wave terms, this fifth-wave movement often signals exhaustion rather than continuation.

Such setups have historically coincided with shifts in market psychology. When sentiment reaches extreme pessimism, selling pressure tends to diminish, even if prices remain subdued. This environment often creates the conditions for sharp reversals, particularly in assets with asymmetric upside potential like Bitcoin.

Relative Value Matters More Than Headlines

Institutional investors rarely focus on price alone. Instead, they assess relative value across asset classes. André Dragosch, Head of Research at Bitwise Europe, recently described Bitcoin’s valuation versus gold as “exceptionally discounted” on a historical basis. According to Dragosch, similar conditions have appeared only a handful of times over the past decade, and each instance eventually preceded significant capital rotations back into Bitcoin.

This discount does not imply that Bitcoin is cheap in absolute terms, but rather that it is undervalued relative to gold when adjusted for liquidity, scarcity, and long-term monetary dynamics. For macro-focused investors, these moments are often more important than short-term price action.

A Structural Shift in the Global Monetary System

Beyond charts and ratios lies a broader transformation. Influential investors such as Ray Dalio have repeatedly warned that the global financial system is undergoing a structural reset. Rising debt burdens, geopolitical fragmentation, and declining trust in traditional reserve assets are forcing countries and institutions to rethink how they store value.

In this environment, gold has reasserted itself as the primary non-sovereign reserve asset. However, Bitcoin shares many of the same characteristics — fixed supply, neutrality, and resistance to debasement — while adding digital portability and transparency. The key difference lies in perception and maturity. Gold benefits first because it is familiar. Bitcoin benefits later because it is disruptive.

Capital Rotations Tend to Be Sequential

According to Dragosch, capital rarely moves into multiple alternative assets simultaneously. Instead, it flows in stages. Gold typically absorbs the initial wave of defensive capital. Once confidence builds and investors seek higher returns, attention shifts toward assets with greater upside potential. Bitcoin has historically been the primary beneficiary of this second phase.

This sequential rotation helps explain why gold’s strength should not necessarily be viewed as a headwind for Bitcoin. On the contrary, gold’s rally may be laying the groundwork for Bitcoin’s next expansion by validating the broader thesis of hard assets and monetary scarcity.

Bitcoin’s Asymmetric Setup: Rare but Powerful

What makes the current setup particularly compelling is the asymmetry involved. Downside risks for Bitcoin are increasingly constrained by institutional adoption, ETF infrastructure, and expanding global liquidity. At the same time, upside potential remains significant if capital flows rotate even modestly away from gold and into digital assets.

Historically, periods where Bitcoin significantly underperformed gold were followed by aggressive catch-up rallies. These moves often occurred rapidly, leaving little opportunity for late entrants to position themselves.

Long-Term Perspective Over Short-Term Noise

Short-term price fluctuations can obscure long-term trends. While Bitcoin’s recent struggle to hold above $90,000 may concern traders, long-term investors are focused on macro positioning rather than daily volatility. From that vantage point, Bitcoin’s discounted relative value may represent opportunity rather than risk.

The Bitcoin-to-gold ratio reaching multi-year lows is not a common event. When it happens, it often reflects peak pessimism — a condition that has historically favored patient investors willing to look beyond immediate headlines.

Conclusion: A Quiet Setup Before the Next Move?

The collapse in the Bitcoin-to-gold ratio has sparked debate, skepticism, and caution. Yet beneath the surface, the data suggests a familiar pattern may be unfolding. Gold leads, Bitcoin lags, sentiment cools — and then capital rotates.

If historical behavior and macro dynamics repeat, Bitcoin’s current underperformance may prove temporary. Rather than signaling decline, the present divergence could mark the early stages of Bitcoin’s next catch-up cycle, one shaped by global monetary transformation and the search for scarce, non-sovereign assets.

For investors who understand cycles, this may not be a moment of fear — but one of quiet preparation.

Ready to Take Control of Your Crypto Journey? Start Trading Safely on BYDFi

Create Answer