Related Questions
A total of 5 cryptocurrency questions
Share Your Thoughts with BYDFi
Trending
ETH Funding Rate Turns Negative — Will Bulls Take the Bait?
ETH Funding Rate Turns Negative: Is This a Trap or a Hidden Opportunity for Ether Bulls?
Ethereum has once again found itself at the center of market debate after its funding rate slipped into negative territory, a signal that often excites contrarian traders. Historically, negative funding rates tend to emerge when fear dominates the market, sometimes setting the stage for sharp rebounds. Yet this time, the broader context suggests that Ether investors may have valid reasons to hesitate.
Over the past week, Ether’s price action has reflected growing uncertainty across the crypto market. ETH suffered a sharp three-day correction of nearly 14%, revisiting the $2,900 support level for the first time in almost a month. This move coincided with a broader market pullback as traders reduced exposure to risk assets amid increasing economic and geopolitical tension.
Although Ether briefly reclaimed the $3,000 mark following news that US President Donald Trump suspended proposed import tariff hikes on several European Union countries, optimism quickly faded. The rebound lacked conviction, and traders remained cautious as liquidation data painted a sobering picture.
Liquidations Shake Confidence Across the ETH Market
One of the most damaging blows to market sentiment came from leveraged traders being flushed out at scale. In just two days, bullish Ether positions worth approximately $480 million were liquidated, highlighting how fragile confidence had become. Such liquidation cascades often reinforce bearish momentum, especially when they occur alongside weakening onchain indicators.
The sell-off also reflected a broader shift toward risk aversion. Macro uncertainty, combined with declining crypto liquidity, has made traders far less willing to hold aggressive long positions. This environment helps explain why Ether’s perpetual futures funding rate briefly turned negative.
What a Negative Funding Rate Really Signals
In normal conditions, Ether’s annualized funding rate tends to hover between 6% and 12%, with long traders paying a premium to maintain leveraged exposure. When the rate flips negative, it means short sellers are paying to keep their positions open, an unusual setup that can hint at overcrowded bearish trades.
However, a negative funding rate is not automatically bullish. In the current environment, it reflects hesitation rather than outright panic. Traders appear unwilling to commit capital, even when contrarian indicators suggest potential upside. This cautious stance is reinforced by declining institutional participation.
ETF Outflows Add to the Pressure
Institutional demand for Ether has shown visible cracks, particularly through spot ETF flows. US-listed Ether spot ETFs recorded roughly $230 million in net outflows in a single day, reversing the previous week’s steady inflow trend. With these ETFs collectively holding more than $17 billion worth of ETH, any sustained outflow represents a meaningful overhang on the market.
Adding to the concern, companies that previously embraced Ether as a treasury reserve asset are now facing mounting accounting losses. Firms such as Bitmine Immersion and Sharplink have seen their balance sheets pressured by ETH’s recent decline, raising questions about whether corporate accumulation strategies will continue.
Options Market Reveals Deep Unease, Not Panic
To better understand professional sentiment, it is essential to look beyond futures and examine the options market. The ETH options skew, which measures the relative pricing of downside versus upside protection, has surged to its highest level in seven weeks. Traders are currently paying a significant premium for downside exposure, signaling discomfort rather than aggressive bearish positioning.
This elevated skew reflects repeated failures by Ether to break above the $3,400 resistance level over the past two months. Each rejection has weakened trader confidence, particularly as Ethereum’s onchain activity shows signs of stagnation.
Falling Network Fees Raise Structural Concerns
Ethereum’s fundamentals have also come under scrutiny. Network fees have declined by roughly 20% over the past week, indicating reduced demand for block space. In contrast, competing blockchains such as Solana and BNB Chain have seen substantial increases in fee generation, highlighting a shift in user activity.
More notably, Solana continues to dominate transaction volume, with Ethereum’s base layer and scaling solutions collectively falling well behind. This growing competitive pressure in decentralized application processing has fueled doubts about Ethereum’s near-term growth narrative.
Trading ETH in a High-Uncertainty Environment
In periods like this, traders increasingly gravitate toward platforms that offer flexibility, advanced derivatives tools, and robust risk management. Exchanges such as BYDFi have gained attention among active traders for providing access to ETH perpetual contracts, options, and spot markets under one roof, allowing participants to adapt quickly as sentiment shifts.
Rather than chasing leverage-heavy bets, many traders are now focusing on capital preservation, hedging strategies, and selective exposure. This cautious approach aligns with the broader market mood, where patience is often more valuable than aggression.
2026-01-26 · 16 hours agoEthereum Security: Commodity or Crypto Asset?
Key Takeaways:
- The debate over whether Ether is a security or a commodity determines how it is regulated.
- The approval of Spot ETFs largely signaled that regulators view ETH as a commodity.
- This classification protects the network from strict securities laws that apply to stocks.
The question of Ethereum security classification has been the biggest regulatory headache in crypto history. For years the SEC and the CFTC fought a turf war over who gets to regulate the second largest cryptocurrency. If it is a security it falls under strict banking laws. If it is a commodity it is treated like digital oil or gold.
This distinction matters because securities laws are designed for companies with CEOs and quarterly reports. Ethereum is a decentralized network with no central office. For investors in 2026 the answer to this question defines the safety and legality of their portfolio.
Why Is the Classification So Confusing?
The confusion stems from the 2014 ICO (Initial Coin Offering). In the beginning investors sent Bitcoin to the Ethereum Foundation and received Ether in return. This looked a lot like a stock sale which usually triggers Ethereum security laws.
However the network evolved. It became sufficiently decentralized. In 2018 a famous speech by William Hinman of the SEC suggested that ETH had morphed from a security into a commodity. This lack of clarity kept institutions on the sidelines for years as they feared a lawsuit.
Did the ETFs Settle the Debate?
Yes they largely did. When the US regulators approved Spot Ethereum ETFs they implicitly admitted that ETH is a commodity. You cannot have a Spot ETF for an unregistered security.
This was a massive victory for the industry. It allowed major financial players to offer ETH products on the spot market without fear of enforcement actions. It signaled that the asset had graduated from the gray area into the regulated white market.
What Does This Mean for Staking?
While the asset itself is safe the act of staking is still debated. Regulators argue that "Staking as a Service" might be an investment contract. This is why many US based ETFs do not offer staking rewards.
This nuance means that while holding ETH is fine earning yield on it through a centralized provider might still be subject to Ethereum security regulations. This pushes many users toward decentralized solutions or on-chain staking where the code manages the yield rather than a company.
Why Does It Matter for Your Portfolio?
If ETH were classified as a security exchanges would have to delist it. Liquidity would dry up and the price would crash. The commodity classification ensures that exchanges like BYDFi can continue to list it freely.
It protects the open nature of the network. Developers can build applications without registering with the government. It keeps the ecosystem open for innovation rather than burying it in paperwork.
Conclusion
The battle over the Ethereum security label seems to have ended in favor of the commodity status. This regulatory clarity is the foundation for the current institutional adoption we are seeing. The network is now recognized as a digital resource rather than a corporate stock.
With the legal clouds clearing, there has never been a better time to engage with the network. Register at BYDFi today to trade Ethereum with full confidence on a compliant and secure platform.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Is Bitcoin a security?
A: No. Bitcoin is universally recognized as a commodity because it had no pre-mine and no central leader. It is the only asset with zero regulatory ambiguity.Q: Who regulates Ethereum?
A: As a commodity it falls under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for fraud and manipulation but the SEC still monitors the ecosystem for unregistered securities sales.Q: Can the laws change?
A: Yes. Congress could pass new legislation that creates a specific "Digital Asset" category. However until then the current commodity framework stands.2026-01-26 · 17 hours agoEthereum’s Recent Activity Boom Tied to Dusting Attacks, Says Researcher
Ethereum’s Network Explosion Raises New Security Questions
Ethereum has recently witnessed an unprecedented surge in on-chain activity, with transaction counts and active addresses reaching record-breaking levels. At first glance, this spike appears to signal renewed adoption, rising user confidence, and growing interest across decentralized finance and Web3 applications. However, new research suggests the story behind these numbers may be far more concerning.
According to blockchain security researcher Andrey Sergeenkov, a significant portion of Ethereum’s recent growth could be artificially inflated by malicious activity, specifically a large-scale wave of address poisoning attacks. These attacks appear to be exploiting Ethereum’s newly reduced transaction fees, turning network efficiency into an unexpected vulnerability.
Record Metrics That Sparked Suspicion
In recent weeks, Ethereum’s network metrics have painted a striking picture. Active address retention reportedly surged to nearly eight million in a single month, while daily transaction counts climbed to almost 2.9 million, marking an all-time high. Even more notable was the week beginning January 12, which saw roughly 2.7 million new addresses interacting with the network—an increase of around 170% compared to typical levels.
While such numbers might normally be interpreted as bullish signals, Sergeenkov warns that they may not reflect genuine user growth. Instead, he believes much of this activity is linked to automated spam behavior driven by address poisoning campaigns operating at an unprecedented scale.
How Lower Gas Fees Changed the Economics of Attacks
The timing of this surge is not coincidental. In early December, Ethereum implemented the Fusaka network upgrade, which significantly reduced transaction costs. In the weeks following the upgrade, average network fees dropped by more than 60%.
While lower fees are generally positive for users and developers, they also reduced the cost of malicious activity. Sergeenkov argues that address poisoning has become far more attractive for attackers because it is now cheap enough to execute mass transactions across millions of wallets without significant capital.
In his view, the ability to scale network infrastructure must be matched by equal attention to user security. Without proper safeguards, efficiency gains can unintentionally empower bad actors.
Understanding Address Poisoning on Ethereum
Address poisoning is a subtle but highly effective scam technique. It involves sending tiny transactions—often worth less than a dollar—from wallet addresses that closely resemble legitimate ones. These transactions appear in a victim’s transaction history, increasing the risk that the user will later copy and reuse the fraudulent address by mistake.
The attack typically begins with scammers sending small amounts of stablecoins to what are known as dust distributor wallets. These wallets then fan out microscopic transactions to massive numbers of addresses, embedding deceptive entries into transaction histories across the network.
Sergeenkov identified these distributor wallets by analyzing wallets that received very small stablecoin amounts as their first-ever transaction, then filtering for addresses that went on to send transactions to more than 10,000 recipients. This pattern strongly suggests automated poisoning behavior rather than organic usage.
Millions Targeted and Hundreds of Thousands Lost
The scale of these attacks is staggering. Some of the most active dust distributor addresses were found to have sent transactions to over 400,000 different recipients. Collectively, these campaigns have already resulted in losses exceeding $740,000, affecting at least 116 confirmed victims.
While this figure may seem modest relative to Ethereum’s total market size, the real concern lies in the trajectory. As long as transaction fees remain low and user awareness remains limited, the potential for further losses continues to grow.
These attacks do not rely on smart contract exploits or protocol flaws. Instead, they exploit human behavior, making them particularly difficult to prevent through technical upgrades alone.
What This Means for Ethereum Users and the Market
The findings highlight a critical challenge for Ethereum as it scales. Rising activity metrics alone are no longer a reliable indicator of healthy network growth. Without deeper analysis, spam-driven transactions can distort perceptions of adoption and usage.
For everyday users, this serves as a reminder to verify wallet addresses carefully and avoid copying addresses directly from transaction histories without double-checking them. For platforms and exchanges, it reinforces the importance of strong security education and clear transaction interfaces.
The Role of Secure Trading Platforms Like BYDFi
As blockchain threats evolve, the choice of trading and asset management platforms becomes increasingly important. Platforms like BYDFi play a key role in protecting users by offering secure environments, clear transaction workflows, and educational resources that help traders avoid common on-chain scams.
BYDFi’s focus on user safety, transparent asset handling, and risk awareness makes it a valuable option for traders navigating increasingly complex blockchain ecosystems. While no platform can eliminate on-chain risks entirely, using reputable exchanges with strong security standards can significantly reduce exposure to threats like address poisoning.
Looking Ahead: Security Must Match Scalability
Ethereum’s continued growth is undeniable, but this episode underscores an important reality. Network scalability and lower fees must go hand in hand with enhanced user protections. Without parallel investment in security awareness and tooling, efficiency improvements can unintentionally amplify malicious behavior.
As researchers continue to monitor on-chain patterns, one thing is clear: the future of Ethereum depends not only on faster and cheaper transactions, but also on ensuring that users can interact with the network safely and confidently in an increasingly hostile digital environment.
2026-01-26 · 18 hours agoNexo Launches Zero-Interest Crypto Loans for BTC and ETH Holders
Nexo Launches Zero-Interest Crypto Lending for Bitcoin and Ether Holders
Crypto lending is entering a new phase in 2025, and Nexo is positioning itself at the center of this transformation. The company has officially launched a zero-interest crypto lending product for Bitcoin and Ether holders, offering a structured alternative for users seeking liquidity without selling their long-term holdings.
The move reflects a broader shift in the digital asset lending market, where predictability, transparency and risk control are becoming more important than aggressive yields or speculative leverage. By removing interest costs altogether, Nexo aims to attract long-term BTC and ETH holders who want access to capital while maintaining exposure to potential price appreciation.
How Nexo’s Zero-Interest Credit Works
Nexo’s new product, known as Zero-Interest Credit, is built around fixed-term lending rather than open-ended borrowing. Users begin by selecting both the loan size and duration in advance, ensuring that all conditions are clearly defined before the loan is activated.
Once the loan is issued, borrowers are not exposed to liquidation risk during the loan term. This is a key distinction from traditional crypto-backed loans, which often rely on continuous margin monitoring and forced liquidations during periods of market volatility. Instead, Nexo locks in the structure until maturity, allowing users to plan with confidence regardless of short-term price fluctuations.
At the end of the loan term, borrowers can settle their obligations using stablecoins or, if preferred, by allocating part of their pledged collateral. Depending on market conditions, users may also choose to renew the loan under updated terms, extending access to liquidity without disrupting their overall crypto strategy.
Expanding a Proven Structured Lending Model
While the zero-interest offering is new for retail users, the underlying structure is not untested. Nexo previously made this lending model available through its private and OTC channels, where it facilitated more than $140 million in borrowing throughout 2025.
That earlier success demonstrated strong demand from institutional and high-net-worth clients for fixed-term, non-liquidating loan structures. By expanding the product to Bitcoin and Ether holders more broadly, Nexo is bringing institutional-style financial engineering to a wider audience.
This approach aligns with the growing maturity of the crypto market, where users increasingly prioritize capital preservation and long-term planning over short-term speculation.
Nexo’s Strategic Comeback and Global Footprint
Founded in 2018, Nexo has grown into one of the most recognized crypto financial services platforms, offering lending, trading and savings products across more than 150 jurisdictions. Like many centralized lenders, the company faced significant challenges during the crypto market downturn of 2022.
In April 2025, Nexo announced plans to reenter the US market after withdrawing in late 2022. This followed a $45 million settlement with the US Securities and Exchange Commission in early 2023, resolving regulatory disputes related to its previous products. The company’s return to the US signals renewed confidence in its compliance framework and long-term strategy.
The launch of zero-interest crypto loans further reinforces Nexo’s efforts to rebuild trust and position itself as a regulated, transparent and resilient player in the evolving digital finance ecosystem.
The Revival of Crypto Lending in 2025
Crypto lending has undergone a dramatic transformation since the collapse of several major platforms in 2022. Companies such as Celsius and BlockFi were widely criticized for risky lending practices that amplified market contagion during the fallout from the FTX collapse.
In response, both centralized and decentralized lenders have redesigned their models around full collateralization, stricter risk controls and clearer user protections. By 2025, this more conservative approach has helped restore confidence across the sector.
Centralized platforms including Nexo, Ledn, Xapo Bank and Coinbase have expanded their lending offerings while emphasizing transparency and sustainability. At the same time, decentralized finance has experienced a strong resurgence driven by improved protocol design and growing institutional participation.
DeFi Lending Growth and Market Leaders
According to data from DefiLlama, DeFi lending total value locked rose from approximately $48 billion at the start of 2025 to a peak of nearly $92 billion in early October. Although the market experienced a temporary decline following a major liquidation event later that month, activity stabilized in November, with total lending TVL currently standing at around $66 billion.
Aave remains the dominant force in decentralized lending, supporting more than $22 billion in outstanding loans backed by over $55 billion in deposited assets. Morpho ranks as the second-largest protocol, facilitating roughly $3.6 billion in loans with approximately $10 billion in supplied liquidity.
These figures highlight the scale and resilience of crypto lending in its current form, particularly when compared to earlier, more fragile market cycles.
What Zero-Interest Loans Mean for Long-Term Crypto Holders
For Bitcoin and Ether holders, Nexo’s zero-interest lending product offers a compelling alternative to selling assets during periods of market uncertainty. By unlocking liquidity without interest costs or liquidation pressure, users can fund expenses, reinvest capital or diversify portfolios while maintaining long-term exposure to core crypto assets.
As the crypto lending industry continues to mature, products like Zero-Interest Credit may represent the next step toward sustainable, user-centric financial services. Rather than chasing yield, platforms are increasingly focused on stability, structure and real-world usability.
Nexo’s latest move suggests that the future of crypto lending will be defined not by risk-taking, but by disciplined financial design tailored to long-term investors.
Explore Smarter Crypto Lending and Trading with BYDFi
While platforms like Nexo continue to innovate in crypto-backed lending, traders and long-term investors looking for greater flexibility can explore BYDFi as a powerful alternative. BYDFi offers a secure and user-friendly environment for trading Bitcoin, Ethereum and a wide range of digital assets, with advanced tools designed for both beginners and professional traders.
With deep liquidity, competitive fees and support for spot and derivatives trading, BYDFi allows users to manage risk efficiently while taking advantage of market opportunities. The platform also emphasizes transparency and robust security standards, making it an attractive choice for those seeking reliable crypto exposure without unnecessary complexity.
As crypto finance evolves toward more structured and sustainable models, BYDFi stands out as a platform built for long-term growth, strategic trading and responsible capital management.
2026-01-09 · 17 days ago
BYDFi Official Blog
Popular Tags
Popular Questions
How to Use Bappam TV to Watch Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi Movies?
How to Withdraw Money from Binance to a Bank Account in the UAE?
ISO 20022 Coins: What They Are, Which Cryptos Qualify, and Why It Matters for Global Finance
Bitcoin Dominance Chart: Your Guide to Crypto Market Trends in 2025
The Best DeFi Yield Farming Aggregators: A Trader's Guide