CoinTalk

Obscure Laws Continue to Delay the Creation of a US Bitcoin Reserve

A Strategic Idea Trapped Inside Legal Complexity

The concept of the United States establishing a national Bitcoin reserve has evolved from a fringe discussion into an official government initiative. Yet, despite growing political acknowledgment and increasing global interest in Bitcoin as a strategic asset, the plan remains stalled. According to Patrick Witt, Director of the White House Crypto Council, the delay has little to do with political resistance and everything to do with complicated and often overlooked legal frameworks.

In recent remarks, Witt confirmed that multiple federal agencies are actively engaged in discussions about the reserve. However, conflicting legal authorities and outdated statutory provisions continue to slow progress. What seems like a simple decision from the outside quickly becomes a maze once federal law and agency mandates are examined in detail.

Inside the White House Crypto Council’s Struggle

Witt revealed that agencies such as the Department of Justice and the Office of Legal Counsel are deeply involved in evaluating whether existing laws allow the government to formally establish and manage a Bitcoin reserve. Each agency operates under strict legal boundaries, many of which were written long before digital assets existed.

The challenge lies in determining which agency has the legal authority to hold Bitcoin, how it should be classified on federal balance sheets, and whether current laws permit long-term custody of a decentralized asset. These  obscure  provisions, as Witt described them, have become the main obstacle rather than political disagreement.

Despite the complexity, Witt stressed that the initiative remains active and has not been abandoned.

Trump’s Executive Order: A Historic Yet Limited Step

In March 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order that formally created a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve alongside a broader Digital Asset Stockpile. This move marked the first time Bitcoin was recognized at the executive level as a potential strategic reserve asset.

The order required the federal government to retain all Bitcoin already in its possession and explicitly prohibited selling those holdings. However, it also placed strict limitations on how the reserve could grow. The government was only allowed to add Bitcoin obtained through asset forfeiture cases, effectively banning direct market purchases.

While symbolic and historic, the order failed to satisfy much of the Bitcoin community, which had expected a more aggressive and forward-looking accumulation strategy.

Why Bitcoin Supporters Felt Let Down

For many Bitcoin advocates, the announcement felt incomplete. A reserve that relies solely on seized assets lacks the strategic intent associated with national reserves like gold or foreign currencies. Critics argue that refusing to acquire Bitcoin on the open market undermines the credibility of the entire initiative.

Bitcoin maximalist voices were particularly vocal. Some claimed that the administration’s approach reflected caution bordering on avoidance, suggesting that Washington was unwilling to fully commit to a fixed-supply asset that exists outside traditional monetary control.

The disappointment intensified when a long-anticipated digital asset policy report released in mid-2025 made no meaningful reference to expanding the Bitcoin reserve. For many investors, this confirmed fears that progress was largely symbolic.

Treasury Signals a Possible Shift in Strategy

Momentum briefly returned in August 2025 when US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent proposed the idea of acquiring Bitcoin through budget-neutral strategies. These approaches would allow the government to accumulate BTC without increasing the national deficit or burdening taxpayers.

Such strategies could involve reallocating existing reserve assets, converting portions of traditional holdings into Bitcoin, or using gains from revalued metals reserves to fund purchases. Although no official plan has been implemented, the proposal reopened serious discussion about whether the US could become an active participant in Bitcoin markets.

If adopted, this approach could dramatically reshape global perceptions of Bitcoin’s role in sovereign finance.

Why a US Bitcoin Reserve Would Change Everything

A fully operational US Bitcoin reserve would represent a turning point not only for cryptocurrency markets but for the global financial system. It would signal that Bitcoin has matured beyond speculation and is now considered a legitimate strategic asset by the world’s largest economy.

Canaan Faces Nasdaq Delisting Risk as Share Price Slips Below Critical Threshold

US Senate Judiciary Pushes Back Against Crypto Developer Protections

A growing divide within the US Senate is threatening to reshape the future of crypto regulation, as top lawmakers from both parties move to strip developer safeguards from a key digital asset bill. The dispute highlights rising concerns that proposed protections could unintentionally weaken law enforcement’s ability to combat illicit financial activity in decentralized crypto markets.

At the center of the debate is the Senate’s long-anticipated crypto market structure legislation, which aims to clarify how regulators oversee digital assets and blockchain-based platforms. However, Senate Judiciary Committee leaders argue that parts of the bill could open dangerous loopholes for criminals operating through decentralized systems.

Bipartisan Warning From the Senate Judiciary Committee

Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Charles Grassley and the committee’s senior Democrat, Richard Durbin, issued a rare bipartisan warning to leaders of the Senate Banking Committee. In a letter sent to Banking Chair Tim Scott and ranking member Elizabeth Warren, the lawmakers urged major revisions to the bill’s language.

According to Grassley and Durbin, the current draft risks undermining long-standing unlicensed money transmitter laws by shielding certain crypto developers and network operators from liability. They warned that this could severely limit the government’s ability to pursue bad actors who exploit decentralized platforms for illegal purposes.

The letter, first reported by Politico, described the proposed protections as creating a  significant enforcement gap  that sophisticated criminal organizations could take advantage of.

Lawmakers Fear Criminal Exploitation of Decentralized Platforms

Grassley and Durbin emphasized that criminal groups already rely on advanced methods to hide illegal transactions, including the use of complex financial structures and anonymizing technologies. They argued that the bill, as currently written, would make it even harder for prosecutors to trace and punish unlawful activity tied to decentralized digital assets.

In their view, removing accountability from developers and network maintainers could turn decentralized platforms into attractive safe havens for illicit actors, including transnational criminal organizations and cartels. The senators stressed that regulatory clarity should not come at the cost of weakening public safety or financial crime enforcement.

The Role of the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act

The controversy largely stems from the inclusion of provisions inspired by the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, or BRCA. This proposal seeks to clarify that individuals who develop blockchain software or maintain decentralized networks are not automatically classified as money transmitters under federal or state law.

Supporters argue that such protections are necessary to foster innovation and prevent developers from being punished for how others use open-source technology. Critics, however, warn that overly broad exemptions could shield individuals who play a more active role in facilitating illicit transactions.

Grassley and Durbin contend that the bill fails to clearly distinguish between neutral software development and conduct that effectively enables unlicensed money transmission.

Judiciary Committee Says It Was Left Out of the Process

Adding to the tension, the Senate Judiciary Committee leaders said they were not consulted during the drafting of the bill, despite their committee’s authority over federal criminal statutes and the Department of Justice.

They expressed frustration that proposed changes affecting criminal enforcement were advanced without giving the Judiciary Committee a meaningful opportunity to review or weigh in. In their letter, they urged the Banking Committee to reject any language that could weaken the government’s ability to hold culpable actors accountable.

This procedural dispute has further complicated efforts to move the legislation forward.

Legislative Delays and Political Uncertainty

The crypto market structure bill has already faced setbacks, with both the Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees postponing scheduled markups in an effort to build broader bipartisan support. The latest objections from the Judiciary Committee add another obstacle to an already fragile legislative path.

If the bill eventually reaches the Senate floor, it will require at least 60 votes to pass. That threshold would likely demand unanimous Republican support and backing from several Democrats, making any internal disagreement particularly consequential.

Crypto Industry Support Begins to Fracture

Industry reaction has also been mixed. Coinbase, one of the most influential lobbying forces in the crypto sector, withdrew its support for the bill earlier this week, citing concerns over multiple provisions. While the company has since indicated that negotiations with lawmakers are ongoing, the move underscored growing unease within the industry.

The combination of political resistance and shifting industry alliances raises questions about whether the bill can survive in its current form.

What This Means for the Future of US Crypto Regulation

The clash over developer protections reflects a broader struggle to balance innovation with enforcement in the rapidly evolving crypto space. Lawmakers face mounting pressure to define clear rules without creating blind spots that criminals can exploit.

As negotiations continue behind closed doors, the fate of the crypto market structure bill remains uncertain. What is clear, however, is that the debate has entered a critical phase—one that could shape how decentralized technologies are regulated in the United States for years to come.

Traveling With Crypto? How Evil Twin  WiFi Can Empty Your Wallet

After a long international flight, exhaustion sets in quickly. Your phone battery is low, your mobile data isn’t working yet, and the airport offers what looks like a lifesaver: free WiFi. You connect without hesitation, log into an exchange, and move some crypto while waiting for your luggage. Everything seems fine — until hours later, when your funds are gone.

This is not bad luck. This is how an  Evil Twin  WiFi attack works.

Public WiFi has become one of the most underestimated threats to crypto holders, especially for travelers. As digital assets become more valuable, attackers are increasingly targeting moments when users are tired, rushed, or disconnected from their usual security habits.

What Is an  Evil Twin WiFi Network?

An Evil Twin is a fake wireless network designed to look identical to a legitimate one. Hackers clone the name of real WiFi networks found in airports, hotels, cafés, and conference venues. When your device connects, it unknowingly hands control of its internet traffic to the attacker.

From that moment, anything you do online can potentially be monitored, intercepted, or manipulated. The danger does not come from breaking encryption directly, but from quietly positioning the attacker between you and the internet.

Security researchers have confirmed that these attacks are especially common in high-traffic travel locations, where people expect free internet and rarely stop to verify its authenticity.

Why Crypto Users Are Prime Targets While Traveling

Crypto transactions are irreversible. Once funds are transferred, there is no bank to call and no chargeback to request. Attackers know this, which is why crypto users are particularly attractive victims.

When connected to a fake WiFi network, attackers may not instantly steal your funds. Instead, they wait for a mistake. A login page that looks legitimate. A prompt asking you to re-authenticate. A fake security update. In some cases, users are even tricked into entering their seed phrase, believing it is required to “restore” access.

Even without direct access to a wallet’s private keys, attackers can still cause serious damage. Stolen exchange credentials, email access, or two-factor authentication codes can be enough to drain centralized accounts within minutes.

Fake Login Pages: The Real Weapon Behind Evil Twins

The most dangerous part of an Evil Twin attack is not the WiFi itself, but what comes after. Once connected, victims are often redirected to counterfeit login pages that perfectly imitate popular exchanges or wallet services.

These pages are designed to exploit trust and fatigue. When you are jet-lagged, stressed, or in a hurry, subtle warning signs are easy to miss. A slightly altered URL, an unexpected verification request, or a sudden  session expired  message can feel routine — but they are often traps.

Attackers rely on social engineering, not advanced hacking. They succeed when users act without double-checking.

Why Public WiFi Alone Doesn’t Automatically Mean You’re Hacked

Connecting to public WiFi does not instantly compromise your crypto. The real danger appears when sensitive actions are taken while connected. Logging into exchanges, approving wallet connections, signing transactions, or changing security settings significantly increases risk.

This is why experienced traders avoid handling serious crypto operations on unknown networks. Even reputable platforms with strong security measures cannot protect users from voluntarily handing credentials to fake interfaces.

Trusted exchanges such as BYDFi, which emphasizes account protection, risk control systems, and secure infrastructure, still advise users to access accounts only through verified networks and official domains. Platform security is strongest when combined with smart user behavior.

How Travelers Can Reduce Crypto Risk Without Becoming Paranoid

The safest approach is behavioral discipline. Many security incidents happen not because systems fail, but because people make rushed decisions. Avoiding high-value transactions while traveling dramatically lowers exposure.

Some experienced crypto users separate their funds into multiple layers. Long-term holdings stay untouched. A secondary wallet is used for travel, containing only limited funds. A small hot wallet handles daily payments or minor interactions. This structure ensures that even if something goes wrong, losses remain controlled.

Using personal mobile hotspots, disabling automatic WiFi connections, and confirming network names directly with venue staff also reduce the chance of connecting to a malicious access point.

When You Have No Choice but to Use Public WiFi

Sometimes, public WiFi is unavoidable. In these cases, encryption becomes critical. A trusted VPN can help protect data by encrypting traffic before it reaches the network. However, VPNs are not magic shields. They reduce risk, but they do not prevent phishing or fake login pages.

Users should always access exchanges and trading platforms through bookmarked URLs or by manually typing the domain. Clicking ads or search engine results while on public WiFi increases exposure to spoofed websites.

Most importantly, no legitimate service will ever ask for a seed phrase. Not during login, not during verification, and not during support interactions. Any such request is a scam — without exception.

Crypto Conferences and Hotels: A Growing Blind Spot

Security professionals have also raised concerns about crypto conferences and hotels. These locations concentrate high-value targets in a single area, often using shared networks. Attackers know this and adjust their tactics accordingly.

Recent incidents shared on social media show how easily a combination of public WiFi, fake prompts, and small mistakes can lead to drained wallets. Even when an Evil Twin network is not directly involved, the environment itself creates opportunities for deception.

The Takeaway: Awareness Is the Best Defense

Evil Twin attacks succeed not through technical brilliance, but through timing and psychology. They target moments of distraction, urgency, and fatigue — conditions that travelers experience daily.

We all have that one friend. They call you up, breathless with excitement, telling you they found a "glitch in the matrix." They discovered a new platform that uses an advanced AI trading bot to generate guaranteed returns of 1% every single day. They show you a screenshot of their dashboard, and sure enough, the number is going up in a straight line. They tell you to mortgage your house, sell your car, and get in now before it’s too late.

If you hear this pitch, you need to hang up the phone. You haven't found a financial miracle; you have found a pyramid scheme.

In the cryptocurrency world, where technology moves fast and understanding is low, these scams thrive. They prey on the universal desire for easy wealth. But beneath the fancy website and the complex jargon about "arbitrage bots" or "cloud mining," the mechanism is centuries old. It is a simple Ponzi scheme, and if you are holding the bag when the music stops, you will lose everything.

The Mathematics of the Lie

To understand why these schemes are mathematically impossible, you just have to look at the promise of "guaranteed returns." In the real world of finance, risk and reward are tied together. If you trade on the Spot market, you might make 10% in a day, but you might also lose 10%. That is reality.

Pyramid schemes claim to break this rule. They promise consistent, high rewards with zero risk. But the money isn't coming from trading profits or product sales. The "profits" paid to the early investors are simply the deposits collected from the new investors. It is a robotic cannibalism. The system only stays alive as long as new victims feed it fresh capital. The moment recruitment slows down, the money runs out, and the entire structure collapses under its own weight.

Recruitment Over Product

The biggest giveaway of a pyramid scheme is its obsession with recruitment. Legitimate crypto projects want you to use their technology. Bitcoin wants you to transact; Ethereum wants you to use smart contracts. Pyramid schemes don't care about the technology; they care about your network.

They gamify the recruitment process. They offer massive referral bonuses, multi-level commission structures, and status tiers like "Diamond Ambassador." If a project spends more time explaining how much money you will make by inviting your family than explaining how their blockchain actually works, it is a scam. They are turning you into a salesperson because they need your credibility to hook the next layer of victims.

The Illusion of Sophistication

Modern crypto pyramid schemes are masters of disguise. They don't look like scams. They hire actors to play the CEO. They rent expensive offices in Dubai or London for promotional videos. They sponsor legitimate crypto conferences to appear credible.

They use "technobabble"—complex words like "high-frequency algorithmic arbitrage" or "quantum liquidity pools"—to confuse investors. They count on you feeling too embarrassed to ask how it actually works. They want you to assume that they are just smarter than everyone else. But complexity is often a mask for emptiness. If they cannot explain the source of the yield in one simple sentence, the yield does not exist.

The Inevitable Exit Scam

The tragedy of the pyramid scheme is the ending. It is always the same. One day, the withdrawals stop. The company claims it is a "technical maintenance" issue or a "hack." They tell the community to remain calm and "HODL."

This is the delay tactic. While the investors are waiting for the maintenance to finish, the founders are draining the liquidity pools and moving the funds through coin mixers to vanish. This is known as the "Rug Pull." When the website finally goes offline, the money is already gone. The dashboard numbers that showed you were a millionaire were just pixels on a screen, backed by nothing.

Conclusion

Real wealth building in crypto is not about finding a magic money printer. It is about understanding the market, managing your risk, and investing in projects with real utility. If something sounds too good to be true, it is.

Imagine the scenario. You are trying to move your funds to catch a fast-moving opportunity, but the transaction gets stuck. It has been thirty minutes, the blockchain is congested, and your money is nowhere to be found. Panic sets in. Your heart rate spikes. In a moment of desperation, you open X (formerly Twitter) or jump into a Telegram group and type out a plea for help.

Almost instantly, a notification pops up. A friendly profile with the official logo of the wallet or exchange you are using replies to you. They apologize for the inconvenience and offer to resolve the issue immediately. They speak professionally, using technical jargon that sounds legitimate. You breathe a sigh of relief, thinking you have found a savior.

But you haven't found a savior. You have just walked into the most prevalent and psychologically damaging trap in the cryptocurrency industry: the Fake Customer Support Scam. Within minutes, your wallet will be drained, and that helpful agent will vanish into the digital ether, leaving you with nothing but a hard lesson in social engineering.

The Psychology of Panic

The reason this scam works so well isn't because the technology is advanced; it works because it exploits human emotion. Scammers know that when money is involved, logic goes out the window. They patrol social media platforms using bots that search for keywords like "Metamask help," "transaction stuck," or "wallet error." They are like vultures circling a wounded animal, waiting for someone to signal that they are confused or afraid.

Once they make contact, their primary weapon is urgency mixed with authority. They create a "ticket" number to make the interaction feel official. They might direct you to a website that looks exactly like the official support portal, complete with live chat functionality. The goal is to keep you moving so fast that you don't stop to check the URL or the username. They play on your fear that if you don't act right now, your funds will be lost forever.

The "Wallet Validation" Trick

The conversation almost always leads to a specific request. The scammer will claim that your wallet is "out of sync" or requires "manual validation" on the blockchain backend to release the stuck transaction. It sounds plausible to a non-technical user, but it is complete nonsense.

To "fix" this, they will send you a link to a website asking you to connect your wallet or, more brazenly, ask you to input your twelve-word seed phrase to "verify ownership." This is the moment of truth. If you type those twelve words into their form, you have handed them the keys to the vault. No legitimate support agent, developer, or exchange administrator will ever ask for your seed phrase. The moment someone requests it, the mask has slipped, and you are talking to a thief.

The Danger of Remote Access

A more aggressive evolution of this scam involves remote desktop software. The "agent" might claim the issue is too complex to fix via chat and ask to screen-share using tools like TeamViewer or AnyDesk to guide you through the process.

This is arguably more dangerous than a phishing link. Once you grant them remote access, they can take control of your computer. They aren't just looking for your crypto; they can install keyloggers, access your bank accounts, or search your computer for unencrypted files containing passwords. They will often distract you in the chat window while they quietly execute transactions in the background. By the time you realize the mouse cursor is moving on its own, it is often too late.

How Real Support Actually Works

To protect yourself, you must understand how legitimate companies operate. Real customer support is reactive, not proactive. They will never DM you first on social media. If you receive an unsolicited message from "Support_Agent_007" offering to help you, it is a scam.

Legitimate platforms use internal ticketing systems. For example, if you encounter an issue while trading on the Spot market at a professional exchange, the support interaction happens within the official app or website domain. It never moves to WhatsApp or Telegram. The verification process happens through your login credentials, not by asking you to reveal your private secrets.

The Zero-Trust Policy

The only way to survive in the crypto ecosystem is to adopt a policy of zero trust. Verify everything. If an account looks official on Twitter, check the handle carefully. Scammers often replace a lowercase "L" with an uppercase "I" or add an underscore to mimic official accounts.

Furthermore, slow down. If your transaction is stuck, it is likely just network congestion. Waiting an hour is infinitely better than rushing into a scam and losing everything. Your panic is the scammer's paycheck. By remaining calm and refusing to share private keys or screen access, you render their entire toolkit useless.

Conclusion

The "friendly" stranger in your DMs is not your friend. They are a predator utilizing the anonymity of the internet to prey on new investors. Customer support scams are successful because they look like help right up until the moment they become theft.