CoinTalk
A total of 1815 cryptocurrency questions
Share Your Thoughts with BYDFi
Trending
Pump.fun says creator fees may have distorted incentives, plans overhaul
A Turning Point for Solana’s Largest Memecoin Launchpad
Pump.fun, one of the most influential memecoin launchpads built on Solana, is entering a new phase after publicly acknowledging that its creator fee model may have unintentionally harmed the platform’s long-term health. The announcement signals a strategic shift for a protocol that has played a defining role in shaping the memecoin boom throughout 2025.
Creator Fees That Worked — Until They Didn’t
According to co-founder Alon Cohen, the Dynamic Fees V1 system initially succeeded in boosting engagement and attracting new creators. Token launches surged, livestream activity exploded, and onchain metrics briefly reached some of their strongest levels of the year. During this period, Pump.fun’s bonding curve volumes more than doubled, reinforcing the perception that the model was working.
However, that growth proved fragile. Cohen later concluded that the system incentivized low-risk token creation over high-risk trading, a dynamic he described as dangerous for market stability. Traders, he emphasized, are the primary source of liquidity and volume, and sidelining them ultimately weakens the entire ecosystem.
When Incentives Favor Minting Over Markets
While creator fees helped a small number of serious teams with active development plans, they failed to change the behavior of most memecoin deployers. In practice, the fees became a motivation to mint as many tokens as possible rather than commit to building deep, liquid markets.
Cohen also pointed out that the user experience often forced traders into uncomfortable situations, such as relying on community takeovers or trusting anonymous actors to keep their promises. This lack of structure eroded confidence and discouraged long-term participation.
Inside Pump.fun’s New Creator Fee Framework
In response, Pump.fun is rolling out the first stage of a redesigned creator fee system. The new framework allows creators and Community Takeover administrators to split fees across up to ten wallets, define precise allocation percentages, transfer ownership of coins, and revoke update authority once a project reaches maturity.
These changes are designed to promote transparency and accountability, while ensuring that responsibility is shared among teams rather than concentrated in a single wallet.
No Fees for the Platform Itself
Cohen made it clear that Pump.fun will not collect creator fees under any circumstances. The system is intended exclusively for creators and active market participants, not the platform. Fees can be claimed at any time and will not expire if left unclaimed, offering flexibility without forcing rushed decisions.
Pump.fun’s Continued Dominance on Solana
Despite recent fluctuations in memecoin hype, Pump.fun remains the dominant launchpad on Solana. Its near-frictionless token creation process and standardized path to liquidity have made it the default destination for memecoin experimentation. Although a rival briefly overtook it in volume during the summer, aggressive PUMP token buybacks and incentive adjustments helped Pump.fun reclaim control of roughly 75% to 80% of Solana’s memecoin launches by late 2025.
A Broader Shift in the Crypto Market
Pump.fun’s redesign reflects a wider trend across crypto markets, where platforms are increasingly forced to rethink incentive models that prioritize short-term volume over sustainable growth. As speculation cools, traders are demanding better liquidity, clearer rules, and stronger market structure.
Why Traders Are Looking Beyond Launchpads
In this environment, many traders are turning to established platforms such as BYDFi, which offers deep liquidity, advanced trading tools, and robust risk management features. Unlike experimental launchpads, BYDFi provides a structured trading environment for both spot and derivatives markets, making it a preferred choice for users seeking exposure to crypto opportunities with greater stability.
What Comes Next for Pump.fun
As Pump.fun attempts to realign its ecosystem, the success of its new creator fee system will be closely watched across the industry. Whether the changes restore balance between creators and traders remains uncertain, but the message is clear: incentive design matters.
For traders navigating an evolving market landscape, combining early-stage opportunities with reliable platforms like BYDFi may prove to be the most sustainable strategy moving forward.
2026-01-19 · 7 days ago0 077Banks’ Stablecoin Fears Are Unsubstantiated Myths, Says Professor
Banks’ Stablecoin Fears Are Built on Myths, Says Columbia Professor
As US lawmakers prepare to move forward with long-awaited crypto market structure legislation, a fierce battle is unfolding behind the scenes — and stablecoins have become the unexpected flashpoint. According to a Columbia Business School professor, the loudest objections coming from the banking sector are not based on evidence, but on fear of losing profits.
Omid Malekan, an adjunct professor at Columbia and a well-known crypto educator, argues that much of the resistance to stablecoin yield-sharing is rooted in misinformation deliberately pushed to protect the traditional banking model. In a recent post on X, Malekan expressed frustration that progress on crypto legislation is being slowed by what he described as unsubstantiated myths surrounding stablecoin economics.
The Real Fight: Who Controls Stablecoin Yield?
At the heart of the debate lies a simple but powerful question: who should benefit from the interest generated by stablecoin reserves?
Stablecoin issuers typically hold reserves in US Treasury bills and bank deposits, which generate yield. Banks and their lobbyists argue that allowing issuers or platforms to share this yield with users creates a dangerous loophole. Their fear is that consumers, attracted by passive returns of around 5%, could pull billions of dollars out of traditional savings accounts, triggering a so-called deposit flight.
Malekan rejects this argument outright, calling it a convenient narrative designed to shield banks from competition rather than protect the financial system.
Why Stablecoins Don’t Drain Bank Deposits
One of the most persistent claims from the banking industry is that stablecoin adoption will inevitably shrink bank deposits. Malekan says this assumption ignores how the stablecoin market actually works.
Much of the demand for stablecoins comes from outside the United States. When foreign users purchase dollar-backed stablecoins, issuers are required to place reserves into US-based assets, including Treasury bills and bank deposits. Rather than draining the system, this process can inject new capital into American banks and government debt markets.
From this perspective, stablecoins are not a threat to deposits but a mechanism that can expand financial activity across borders.
Competition Isn’t the Problem — Profits Are
Another key myth, according to Malekan, is that stablecoins will cripple bank lending. In reality, stablecoins do not prevent banks from issuing loans. What they do is challenge banks’ ability to pay near-zero interest while earning substantial returns elsewhere.
Today, the average US savings account yields just over half a percent. If banks fear losing customers to yield-bearing stablecoins, Malekan argues, the solution is straightforward: pay savers more. Stablecoins introduce competition, not collapse.
Banks Are No Longer the Main Credit Engine
The argument that stablecoins could choke off credit also ignores a structural shift in the US financial system. Banks now provide only about one-fifth of total credit in the economy. The majority comes from non-bank sources such as money market funds, private credit firms, and capital markets.
These sectors could actually benefit from stablecoin adoption through faster settlement, lower transaction costs, and potentially reduced Treasury yields. Rather than weakening the system, stablecoins may enhance its efficiency.
Community Banks Aren’t the Real Victims
Much of the lobbying effort frames community and regional banks as the most vulnerable players. Malekan calls this another misleading narrative.
According to him, large money-center banks have far more to lose if stablecoins disrupt the status quo. Community banks are often used as a shield in public messaging, while the real objective is protecting the outsized profits of the largest financial institutions.
He describes the situation as an uncomfortable alliance between big banks defending their margins and certain crypto startups pitching services to smaller banks under the guise of protection.
Savers Matter Too — Not Just Borrowers
Public policy discussions often focus heavily on borrowers, but Malekan insists that savers deserve equal attention. Preventing stablecoin issuers from sharing yield effectively forces consumers to subsidize bank profits by accepting minimal returns on their money.
A healthy economy depends on both savers and borrowers. Blocking innovation that benefits savers simply to preserve existing profit structures undermines that balance.
Congress Faces a Choice: Consumers or Corporations
Malekan concludes with a clear message to lawmakers. The stablecoin yield debate should not be about preserving legacy advantages but about encouraging innovation and serving consumers.
He warns that many of the claims circulating in Washington lack empirical support and urges Congress to remain focused on progress rather than pressure from powerful lobbies.
Growing Pushback Against Banking Influence
The debate has also drawn reactions from legal and political figures. Lawyer and Senate candidate John Deaton recently reminded voters that senators are facing intense pressure from banking interests to prevent platforms like Coinbase from offering stablecoin rewards.
Deaton’s message was blunt: banks and career politicians do not necessarily act in the public’s best interest. He pointed out that restrictions on stablecoin yields could stifle innovation and limit consumer choice.
Coinbase has reportedly gone as far as warning that it may withdraw support for the CLARITY Act if lawmakers impose restrictions on stablecoin rewards beyond basic disclosure requirements — a sign of how high the stakes have become.
A Defining Moment for Crypto Regulation
As the market structure bill heads toward markup, the stablecoin yield issue may determine whether the US embraces a more competitive, consumer-focused financial system or reinforces the dominance of traditional banks.
2026-01-19 · 7 days ago0 054US Senate Agriculture Committee Delays Crypto Bill Markup to Month’s End
US Senate Delays Crypto Market Structure Bill as Bipartisan Talks Continue
The push to bring regulatory clarity to the US crypto market has hit another temporary pause. Lawmakers on the US Senate Agriculture Committee have decided to delay the markup of the highly anticipated crypto market structure bill, pushing the process to the final week of January as negotiations continue behind the scenes.
The decision reflects ongoing efforts to secure broader bipartisan backing for legislation that could fundamentally reshape how digital assets are regulated in the United States.
Why the Senate Agriculture Committee Hit Pause
Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman confirmed that the committee needs additional time to finalize unresolved details and bring more lawmakers on board. While progress has been made, Boozman emphasized that moving forward without sufficient bipartisan support could weaken the bill’s long-term viability.
According to Boozman, discussions have been constructive, and lawmakers are actively working toward consensus. However, the complexity of crypto regulation, combined with political sensitivities, has made it clear that rushing the markup could be counterproductive.
The committee now plans to mark up the legislation during the last week of January, giving negotiators a narrow window to bridge remaining gaps.
What This Crypto Bill Is Trying to Achieve
At the center of the debate is the question of who regulates what in the crypto industry. The bill aims to clearly define the roles of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, two agencies that have long overlapped in their oversight of digital assets.
For years, crypto companies and investors have operated in a regulatory gray zone, often facing enforcement actions without clear guidance. This legislation is expected to establish firm boundaries, offering long-awaited certainty for exchanges, developers, and institutional investors alike.
Because the Senate Agriculture Committee oversees the CFTC, its involvement is critical to shaping how commodities-like digital assets are regulated going forward.
Senate vs House: Different Paths to Crypto Regulation
The Senate bill is not the same as the House’s CLARITY Act, which passed in July. Due to procedural rules, the Senate must advance its own version, even though both bills aim to address similar regulatory challenges.
Originally, the Agriculture Committee planned to align its markup with the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees the SEC. While the Banking Committee is still expected to proceed, the Agriculture Committee’s delay introduces uncertainty into the timeline for unified Senate action.
This divergence highlights the difficulty of coordinating crypto legislation across committees with different priorities and regulatory philosophies.
Stablecoin Yields and Ethics Rules Take Center Stage
One of the most contentious areas in ongoing negotiations involves stablecoins and ethics provisions. Lawmakers and lobbyists are pushing for changes that would ban all stablecoin yield payments, extending restrictions beyond issuers to include third-party platforms such as crypto exchanges.
This push follows the GENIUS Act, which already prohibited stablecoin issuers from offering yields. Traditional banking lobbyists argue that allowing exchanges to provide yields creates unfair competition and regulatory loopholes.
At the same time, several Democratic senators are pressing for stronger ethics rules. These proposals include conflict-of-interest provisions designed to prevent public officials from profiting from ties to crypto companies, with some language explicitly covering the president and senior government officials.
Industry Pushback and Developer Protections
Crypto advocacy groups and major industry players are actively lobbying to protect software developers and non-custodial platforms. Their concern is that overly broad definitions could classify developers as financial intermediaries, subjecting them to compliance requirements designed for banks and brokers.
The industry argues that such a move would stifle innovation, push development offshore, and undermine the decentralized nature of blockchain technology. Ensuring that open-source developers are excluded from intermediary classifications remains a key demand from the crypto sector.
Political Risks and the Midterm Election Factor
Despite the momentum surrounding crypto regulation, political reality looms large. Investment bank TD Cowen recently warned that upcoming US midterm elections could significantly reduce the support needed to pass the bill.
If control of Congress shifts or political priorities change, the legislation could be delayed for years. TD Cowen suggested that the bill is more likely to pass in 2027, with full implementation potentially not arriving until 2029.
This timeline underscores why the crypto industry is watching January’s markup so closely. For many stakeholders, it may represent one of the last realistic windows for meaningful reform in the near term.
What Comes Next for US Crypto Regulation
While the delay may disappoint market participants eager for clarity, it also signals that lawmakers are taking the process seriously. A bill passed with strong bipartisan support is far more likely to survive political shifts and legal challenges.
As the final week of January approaches, attention will remain firmly fixed on Capitol Hill. Whether lawmakers can reconcile competing interests and deliver a comprehensive framework may determine the future of crypto innovation in the United States.
Ready to Take Control of Your Crypto Journey? Start Trading Safely on BYDFi
2026-01-19 · 7 days ago0 085VanEck Predicts Q1 Will Mark a Shift Toward Risk-On Investing
VanEck Sees Q1 2026 as a Turning Point Toward a Risk-On Market Environment
Global investment firm VanEck believes the first quarter of 2026 could mark a decisive shift in investor sentiment, transforming markets into a risk-on environment after years of uncertainty. According to the firm’s latest outlook, clearer fiscal policies, more predictable monetary direction, and stronger thematic visibility are restoring confidence across global markets.
In its Q1 2026 outlook, VanEck highlighted something investors have not experienced consistently in recent years: visibility. As markets enter the new year, uncertainty around government spending, interest rate policy, and long-term economic direction appears to be easing, creating fertile ground for risk assets to regain momentum.
However, while optimism is spreading across equities, technology, and emerging investment themes, Bitcoin’s role in this evolving environment remains complex and less predictable than in past cycles.
Bitcoin’s Traditional Cycle No Longer Tells the Full Story
VanEck noted that Bitcoin’s long-observed four-year cycle broke down in 2025, making short-term signals far less reliable. This structural shift has introduced new challenges for crypto investors trying to time market movements based on historical patterns.
As a result, the firm adopts a more cautious near-term stance on Bitcoin over the next three to six months, even as broader risk appetite improves. That caution is not unanimous across VanEck’s leadership, as some executives remain more constructive on Bitcoin’s immediate trajectory, suggesting internal debate on how crypto will respond to the macro shift.
Despite this uncertainty, Bitcoin’s recent behavior indicates a market that has matured. Following a major deleveraging event in October, Bitcoin decoupled from both equity and gold markets, trading sideways while leverage was flushed out of the system.
Why Risk-On Conditions Matter for Crypto and Tech Assets
A risk-on environment traditionally favors assets such as technology stocks, artificial intelligence plays, and cryptocurrencies. When investors feel more confident about economic stability and policy direction, they tend to allocate more capital to growth-oriented and higher-volatility investments.
Bitcoin’s recent sideways movement may appear underwhelming on the surface, but analysts argue it reflects a healthier market structure. With leverage reduced and speculative excess removed, price action has become more grounded, allowing accumulation to occur quietly beneath the surface.
Market participants increasingly see this phase as consolidation rather than weakness, particularly as broader macro conditions tilt in favor of risk assets.
Fiscal Stability Begins to Calm Long-Term Market Fears
One of the most significant drivers behind VanEck’s optimistic outlook is the gradual improvement in the US fiscal picture. While deficits remain elevated, they are shrinking relative to GDP compared to the historic peaks reached during the COVID era.
This fiscal stabilization is playing a crucial role in anchoring long-term interest rates and reducing tail risks that have haunted markets for years. As uncertainty around government borrowing and spending eases, investors gain confidence in long-term asset allocation decisions.
VanEck emphasizes that this process is gradual, but meaningful enough to reshape expectations for 2026 and beyond.
Analysts See a Cleaner Market After 2025’s Reset
Industry analysts echo VanEck’s view that markets are entering 2026 in a healthier state. According to Arctic Digital’s head of research, recent price action confirms that much of last year’s excess speculation has been removed.
Bitcoin’s steady rise in a low-leverage environment suggests a more realistic balance between bulls and bears. Oversold indicators are beginning to recover, and extreme bearish narratives have faded, replaced by cautious optimism.
Even geopolitical tensions and friction between policymakers and central banks have not derailed sentiment. Instead, many analysts believe crypto is positioned to catch up as broader risk appetite strengthens.
2026 Outlook Strengthens as Political Catalysts Approach
Looking beyond the first quarter, several researchers argue that the market trajectory for the first half of 2026 is becoming increasingly clear. With US midterm elections approaching, fiscal and financial conditions are expected to favor risk assets even further.
Fiscal stimulus, accommodative monetary policy, and more constructive regulatory developments are aligning to create what many describe as a classic risk-on macro window. In this environment, Bitcoin and the wider crypto market could benefit significantly as capital flows return to alternative assets.
Some investors go even further, arguing that the current macro landscape mirrors the very conditions Bitcoin was designed for, marked by institutional uncertainty, sovereign diversification, and rising geopolitical risk.
Can Bitcoin Reclaim Six Figures?
Optimism around Bitcoin’s price remains strong among prominent analysts. Several market watchers believe Bitcoin is on the verge of reclaiming six-figure territory, driven by sustained buying pressure and strong technical support.
Bitcoin has consistently held above key moving averages, with buyers stepping in during pullbacks. This prolonged consolidation range is increasingly viewed as a launchpad rather than a ceiling.
According to bullish forecasts, a clean break above the $92,000 level could trigger a rapid move toward $100,000 within days, reflecting pent-up momentum after nearly two months of sideways trading.
Final Thoughts: Visibility May Be the Catalyst Markets Needed
VanEck’s outlook suggests that clarity, not speculation, could be the defining force of early 2026. As fiscal and monetary uncertainty fades, investors are gaining the confidence needed to embrace risk once again.
While Bitcoin’s path may not follow historical patterns, its resilience during consolidation, combined with improving macro conditions, positions it as a potential beneficiary of the broader risk-on shift.
For investors navigating 2026, the message is clear: visibility is back, confidence is rebuilding, and the market may be entering a new phase where opportunity favors those prepared for calculated risk.
Ready to Take Control of Your Crypto Journey? Start Trading Safely on BYDFi
2026-01-19 · 7 days ago0 071
BYDFi Official Blog
Popular Tags
Popular Questions
How to Use Bappam TV to Watch Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi Movies?
How to Withdraw Money from Binance to a Bank Account in the UAE?
ISO 20022 Coins: What They Are, Which Cryptos Qualify, and Why It Matters for Global Finance
Bitcoin Dominance Chart: Your Guide to Crypto Market Trends in 2025
The Best DeFi Yield Farming Aggregators: A Trader's Guide